Study Shows How New Antibody Therapy Works Against Ovarian Cancer

Abigail Harris • April 10, 2025

Research has shed light on how a new type of antibody treatment reactivates patients’ immune cells to fight ovarian cancer.

The research, from the group of Professor Sophia Karagiannis at King’s College London, could help to better understand the responses of patients who receive this type of therapy.

Antibody treatments are a type of immunotherapy, which work by helping the body’s immune system to recognise and kill cancer cells. Almost all antibodies currently used in cancer treatment are made from a type of antibody called IgG, however, IgGs have not been effective against ovarian cancer.

Researchers at King’s are the first in the world to develop a treatment from a different type of antibody, called IgE. IgE has important roles in triggering the immune response during an allergic reaction or by stimulating immune cells to fight parasite infections. Unlike IgG antibodies, which activate immune cells circulating in the blood, IgE antibodies bind very tightly to immune cells found in tissues. The team has been working to harness these immune-boosting activities of IgE against solid cancers.

The team investigated an IgE antibody called MOv18, exploring its ability to activate immune cells from patients at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust with ovarian cancer and its influence on the tumour’s environment.

The research showed that MOv18 IgE works in a unique way, by reversing the suppression of the immune system imposed by the tumour, through activation of different groups of immune cells against the cancer.

MOv18 IgE treatment has already shown promising results in a phase Ia clinical trial designed and run by the King’s researchers in the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Guy’s and St Thomas’ Clinical Research Facility and in collaboration with Cancer Research UK’s Centre for Drug Development. At low doses, MOv18 IgE shrank the tumour of a patient with ovarian cancer who had not responded to conventional therapy. In a new study, the team set out to understand exactly how the antibody works in the immune environment conditions of ovarian cancer.

The findings were published today in Nature Communications and the work was supported by Cancer Research UK, the Medical Research Council and Breast Cancer Now.

Understanding the biology

In the multidisciplinary study, conducted at King’s in collaboration with colleagues at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, the Medical University of Vienna, Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, and SeromYx Systems, Inc, the team looked at how MOv18 IgE interacts with different groups of immune cells in ovarian cancer patients. They principally investigated macrophages, an immune cell which normally fights infection and kills microorganisms. However, cancer can corrupt macrophages – suppressing their ability to trigger an immune response and re-programming them to support tumour growth instead.

Previous research in animal models suggested that MOv18 IgE activates these corrupted macrophages to drive them towards fighting the cancer. To investigate this in the human context of ovarian cancer, the team first collected macrophages from healthy donors and then exposed them to cancerous fluid samples from the peritoneal cavity (the main site of ovarian cancer spread) of patients with ovarian cancer. The team then isolated macrophages directly from these patient-derived cancerous fluid samples. All patient samples were collected from Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust.

In both cases, they found that ovarian cancer suppressed the immune activity of macrophages. However, they discovered that MOv18 IgE could bind and activate these suppressed macrophages to kill ovarian cancer cells. Additionally, through this activation, MOv18 IgE reversed the suppressive effect of ovarian cancer macrophages on other immune cells called T cells, which are known to be key in maintaining long-term immune responses against cancer in patients.

Dr Gabriel Osborn, who conducted the research when he was a PhD student at King’s College London, said: “ We found that in patients, ovarian cancer re-programmed macrophages away from normal immune activation. Instead, they formed an immunosuppressive web in association with T cells, that could restrict anti-cancer immunity in patients. MOv18 IgE however induced patient macrophages to kill cancer cells and undergo a highly inflammatory activation, which reversed their suppressive effects on T cells. This study adds important patient-level information to support what we previously observed for MOv18 IgE in the laboratory and reveals, for the first time, that IgE-driven macrophage stimulation can activate the wider tumour immune system.

After seeing these results in the lab, the team looked at tumour biopsies from two patients who took part in the phase Ia clinical trial. They analysed one biopsy from each patient that had been collected before treatment with MOv18, and a second biopsy that was collected after treatment. They saw increased numbers of macrophages and T cells present in the post-treatment samples, indicating these two groups of immune cells play a key role in the anti-tumour activity of MOv18 IgE.

Understanding the biology of how a treatment works is essential for bringing treatments closer to patients, ” says Professor Sophia Karagiannis, Professor of Translational Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy at King’s College London and senior author of the study. “ We found that immune cells which are otherwise inhibited in the ‘microenvironment’ of the tumour, are directed by IgE to target the cancer cells. While we are still progressing with clinical testing in patients, it is imperative that we continue in our quest towards understanding how MOv18 IgE, and a wider panel of IgE-based antibodies we are studying, harness the immune system in different groups of patients and cancer types.”

Dr Debra Josephs, consultant medical oncologist at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and co-author of the study who developed pre-clinical research studies that guided MOv18 IgE to clinical testing said: “ Our focus is to deepen our understanding of the immune system and its interaction with cancer, with the goal of discovering better treatments for patients. During the preclinical development of MOv18 IgE we demonstrated the important role of activation and migration of tumour-associated macrophages into cancer lesions for this antibody treatment to be effective. This research marks an important next step in the development of MOv18 IgE by advancing our understanding of macrophage-mediated mechanisms, thus supporting the therapeutic potential of this novel antibody.”

Professor James Spicer, Professor of Experimental Cancer Medicine at King’s College London, consultant in medical oncology at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and Chief Clinical Investigator of the MOv18 IgE Phase Ia trial, who is co-author of the study said: “ We need to achieve better outcomes for our patients. Clear progress is being made by studying the immune system and the environment in which the cancer grows. In our ongoing research we are striving to understand how we can capitalise on the power of IgE to develop novel effective treatments, which will complement established IgG antibody drugs used in the clinic.

The authors also acknowledge support from the Cancer Research UK City of London Centre and the King’s Health Partners Centre for Translational Medicine.

Read the full paper here.

Information on MOv18 IgE:

  • MOv18 IgE antibody was discovered and developed at King’s College London, in collaboration with Dr Mariangela Figini at Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy, and clinically tested by the Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre based at Guy’s Hospital.
  • MOv18 IgE has been licenced by Epsilogen Ltd., a King’s College London spinout company founded by Sophia Karagiannis and James Spicer. MOv18 IgE is undergoing a Phase Ib trial ( NCT06547840 ).

Notes to editors:

King’s College London

King’s College London is amongst the top 40 universities in the world and top 10 in Europe (THE World University Rankings 2024), and one of England’s oldest and most prestigious universities.  With an outstanding reputation for world-class teaching and cutting-edge research, King’s maintained its sixth position for ‘research power’ in the UK (2021 Research Excellence Framework). King’s has more than 33,000 students (including more than 12,800 postgraduates) from some 150 countries worldwide, and 8,500 staff. For nearly 200 years, King’s students and staff have used their knowledge and insight to make a positive impact on people, society and the planet.

SeromYx Systems, Inc.

SeromYx Systems, Inc. is a global leader in providing GCLP high-throughput antibody characterization services and Systems Serology, offering advanced solutions for the comprehensive analysis of immune responses. With a dedication to innovation and excellence, SeromYx is at the forefront of revolutionizing the field of immunology through its cutting-edge technologies and strategic collaborations.

National Institute for Health and Care Research

The mission of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) is to improve the health and wealth of the nation through research. We do this by:

  • Funding high quality, timely research that benefits the NHS, public health and social care;
  • Investing in world-class expertise, facilities and a skilled delivery workforce to translate discoveries into improved treatments and services;
  • Partnering with patients, service users, carers and communities, improving the relevance, quality and impact of our research;
  • Attracting, training and supporting the best researchers to tackle complex health and social care challenges;
  • Collaborating with other public funders, charities and industry to help shape a cohesive and globally competitive research system;
  • Funding applied global health research and training to meet the needs of the poorest people in low and middle income countries.

NIHR is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care. Its work in low and middle income countries is principally funded through UK international development funding from the UK government.

December 4, 2025
The Fc Review: Continuing our series taking a closer look at recent Fc-focused papers, what they found, and why it matters for antibody discovery and development. Can we program the Fc region? A recent bioRxiv preprint explores this question at scale, using millions of Fc variants to train machine learning models that predict functional outcomes across FcγR interactions. Background: Through engagement with Fc-receptors, the antibody Fc domain can direct a broad range of immune activities, including phagocytosis, cytokine release, antigen presentation, and immune cell polarization – each of which could be precisely tuned to combat disease. Fc engineering has traditionally focused on modifying one property at a time (E.g., ADCC, ADCP, or half-life). This work instead treats the Fc region as a functional design space and explores how sequence variations across the Fc domain can be linked to real immune engagement. 
November 20, 2025
The Fc Review: One Fc variant, three advantages? A Nature Communications study demonstrates how a single Fc-engineered IgG achieved improved half-life, mucosal distribution, and enhanced immune-mediated killing, across both cancer and bacterial models. Background: Fc engineering is often discussed through a single lens, half-life extension, effector boosting, or silencing. This paper explores a broader question: can an Fc variant containing three point mutations deliver multiple functional gains across different biological systems?
October 28, 2025
The Fc Review: How does Fc engineering shape bispecific antibody function? A Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology review explores how the Fc region can be tuned to control effector function, half-life, and safety, key levers in the design of next-generation bispecific antibodies ( bsAbs ). Background: Bispecific antibodies bring new therapeutic possibilities by engaging multiple targets at once. But this complexity also brings new challenges, from unwanted immune activation to altered pharmacokinetics . The Fc region plays a central role here, acting as both a stabilizing scaffold and a regulator of immune effector engagement
October 23, 2025
Abstract: Fc engineering to enhance antibody effector functions harbors the potential to improve therapeutic effects. Understanding FcγR expression and distribution in the tumor microenvironment prior to and following treatment may help guide immune-engaging antibody design and patient stratification. In this study, we investigated FcR-expressing immune effector cells in HER2 + and triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC), including neoadjuvant chemotherapy–resistant disease. FcγRIIIa expression, FcγRIIIa + NK cells, and classically activated (M1-like) macrophages correlated with improved anti-HER2 antibody efficacy. FcγRIIIa protein and FcγRIIIa + NK cells and macrophages were present in primary TNBC and retained in treatment-resistant tumors.
Text:
October 10, 2025
Antibody Engineering & Therapeutics 2025
September 15, 2025
Background Authorized COVID-19 vaccines require boosters for continued protection; however, the lack of crossplatform compatible boosters creates practical challenges to keeping populations protected. Methods This Phase 3, multicenter, international, randomized, active-controlled trial compared UB-612 as a thirddose heterologous booster to BNT162b2, ChAdOx1-S, or BBIBP-CorV homologous boosters in healthy subjects aged ≥16 years. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a single intramuscular injection of UB-612 or an active comparator matching the primary dose, and were stratified for age, sex, N-protein seropositivity, and time since the last dose of their primary series COVID-19 vaccination. The primary objective was to show noninferiority of neutralizing antibody geometric mean titer (GMT) against live SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan strain after boosting with UB-612 or each of the licensed platform vaccines. Secondary and exploratory objectives covered short and long-term antibody responses. The safety analysis addressed subject and investigator reported adverse events. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05293665, and completed on September 12, 2023.
September 9, 2025
The Fc Review: Continuing our series taking a closer look at recent Fc-focused papers, what they found, and why it matters for antibody discovery and development. How does Fc engineering shape the translation of antibodies from preclinical models to the clinic? A new industry-wide review with 15 case studies examines the impact of Fc modifications on pharmacology and safety, and the challenges of predicting human outcomes from nonclinical studies. Background: Fc regions do not only extend half-life, they drive functions like ADCC , ADCP, CDC, and immune modulation. Engineering the Fc can enhance, silence, or redirect these activities. But the same changes that deliver potency can also introduce risk, especially when preclinical models do not fully mirror human Fc receptor biology.
August 25, 2025
NextGen Biomed 2026
August 13, 2025
The Fc Review: Kicking off a new series where we take a closer look at recent Fc-focused papers. What they found, and why it matters for antibody discovery and development. How much does FcγR genetic variation influence an antibody’s function? A recent FDA review examines the often-overlooked role of Fcγ receptor (FcγR) polymorphisms in shaping therapeutic antibody activity, and the implications for the assays used to measure it. Background: FcγRs are the “effector arm” connection between antibodies and immune cells, driving processes like ADCC and ADCP. Genetic variation in these receptors can alter binding strength, modulate effector function, and impact clinical outcomes. Understanding this interplay is important for therapeutic design, potency assessment, and patient response prediction.
July 23, 2025
Journal Abstract: Antibodies targeting the malaria circumsporozoite protein (CSP) can prophylactically protect against malaria by targeting Plasmodium parasites before they establish symptomatic blood-stage disease. Engineering the antibody Fc region to more effectively engage immune effector functions has produced therapeutic antibodies with enhanced potency against viral and oncological targets. However, whether Fc-dependent immune effector functions can contribute to the protection of malaria CSP mAbs or be further enhanced via engineering has been limitedly tested. Here, we report that Fc-dependent effector functions are required for achieving maximal protection via prophylactic treatment with the CSP mAb 317. We further report that Fc engineering modulated the activity of multiple CSP mAbs in multiple in vitro assays of effector function. Our studies revealed that the mAbs L9 and CIS43 were more potent drivers of antibody-dependent phagocytosis, NK activation and killing, and complement deposition. In contrast, 317, but not L9 and CIS43, drove enhanced activation of CSP-responsive T-cells after DC acquisition of mAb-complexed antigens. Collectively, our data suggest that effector function represents an important mechanism of anti-CSP antibodies with the potential to enhance activity through Fc engineering.
More Posts →