Evaluation of a mosaic HIV 1 vaccine in a multicentre randomised double blind placebo controlled phase 1 2a clinical trial APPROACH and in rhesus monkeys.

July 21, 2018

Background

More than 18 million new cases of HIV-1 infection were diagnosed worldwide in 2016. No licensed prophylactic HIV-1 vaccine exists. A major limitation to date has been the lack of direct comparability between clinical trials and preclinical studies. We aimed to evaluate mosaic adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26)-based HIV-1 vaccine candidates in parallel studies in humans and rhesus monkeys to define the optimal vaccine regimen to advance into clinical efficacy trials.


Methods

We conducted a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2a trial (APPROACH). Participants were recruited from 12 clinics in east Africa, South Africa, Thailand, and the USA. We included healthy, HIV-1-uninfected participants (aged 18–50 years) who were considered at low risk for HIV-1 infection. We randomly assigned participants to one of eight study groups, stratified by region. Participants and investigators were blinded to the treatment allocation throughout the study. We primed participants at weeks 0 and 12 with Ad26.Mos.HIV (5 × 1010 viral particles per 0·5 mL) expressing mosaic HIV-1 envelope (Env)/Gag/Pol antigens and gave boosters at weeks 24 and 48 with Ad26.Mos.HIV or modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA; 108 plaque-forming units per 0·5 mL) vectors with or without high-dose (250 μg) or low-dose (50 μg) aluminium adjuvanted clade C Env gp140 protein. Those in the control group received 0·9% saline. All study interventions were administered intramuscularly. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability of the vaccine regimens and Env-specific binding antibody responses at week 28. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed at week 52. All participants who received at least one vaccine dose or placebo were included in the safety analysis; immunogenicity was analysed using the per-protocol population. We also did a parallel study in rhesus monkeys (NHP 13-19) to assess the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of these vaccine regimens against a series of six repetitive, heterologous, intrarectal challenges with a rhesus peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived challenge stock of simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV-SF162P3). The APPROACH trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02315703.


Findings

Between Feb 24, 2015, and Oct 16, 2015, we randomly assigned 393 participants to receive at least one dose of study vaccine or placebo in the APPROACH trial. All vaccine regimens demonstrated favourable safety and tolerability. The most commonly reported solicited local adverse event was mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site (varying from 69% to 88% between the different active groups vs 49% in the placebo group). Five (1%) of 393 participants reported at least one grade 3 adverse event considered related to the vaccines: abdominal pain and diarrhoea (in the same participant), increased aspartate aminotransferase, postural dizziness, back pain, and malaise. The mosaic Ad26/Ad26 plus high-dose gp140 boost vaccine was the most immunogenic in humans; it elicited Env-specific binding antibody responses (100%) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis responses (80%) at week 52, and T-cell responses at week 50 (83%). We also randomly assigned 72 rhesus monkeys to receive one of five different vaccine regimens or placebo in the NHP 13-19 study. Ad26/Ad26 plus gp140 boost induced similar magnitude, durability, and phenotype of immune responses in rhesus monkeys as compared with humans and afforded 67% protection against acquisition of SHIV-SF162P3 infection (two-sided Fisher's exact test p=0·007). Env-specific ELISA and enzyme-linked immunospot assay responses were the principal immune correlates of protection against SHIV challenge in monkeys.


Interpretation

The mosaic Ad26/Ad26 plus gp140 HIV-1 vaccine induced comparable and robust immune responses in humans and rhesus monkeys, and it provided significant protection against repetitive heterologous SHIV challenges in rhesus monkeys. This vaccine concept is currently being evaluated in a phase 2b clinical efficacy study in sub-Saharan Africa (NCT03060629).


Funding

Janssen Vaccines & Prevention BV, National Institutes of Health, Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, US Department of Defense, and International AIDS Vaccine Initiative.


Authors:

Barouch DH, et al. Lancet. 2018 Jul 21; 392(10143): 232–243.



Journal:

Lancet

Access Full Publication

Overview of antibody-drug conjugates nonclinical and clinical toxicities and related contributing factors

June 26, 2026
The Fc Review: Can better antibody engineering improve safety, not just efficacy? A recent review in Antibody Therapeutics examines how the molecular design of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) influences both nonclinical and clinical toxicities, highlighting that safety is determined by far more than the payload alone. Background: ADCs are often discussed in terms of target selection and payload potency, but their safety profile is shaped by the combined properties of the antibody, linker, payload, conjugation strategy, and target biology. This review examines data from marketed ADCs and explores how each component contributes to toxicity, providing a useful framework for designing safer next-generation therapeutics. The study highlights: ADC toxicity is influenced by the combined effects of target antigen expression, antibody structure, linker stability, payload properties, and conjugation technology rather than any single design feature. The Fc region can contribute to off-target toxicity through receptor-mediated uptake. The review discusses roles for Fcγ receptors, FcRn, and C-type lectin receptors in nonspecific internalization that may influence safety. Site-specific conjugation technologies can improve homogeneity, produce more consistent drug-to-antibody ratios (DAR), and enhance stability compared with earlier random conjugation approaches. Properties such as linker stability, payload hydrophobicity, charge, and DAR all influence biodistribution, payload release, and toxicity, underscoring the importance of considering these design variables together.

The double-edged nature of antibody bivalency: mathematical and experimental analysis of cell surface antigen occupancy and opsonization

June 4, 2026
The Fc Review: When does antibody bivalency help, and when can it work against you? A recent mAbs study explores the impact of antibody bivalency on antigen occupancy and cell surface opsonization, revealing that the same property can be advantageous or disadvantageous depending on the intended mechanism of action (MoA). Background: Most therapeutic antibodies are bivalent, meaning they can bind two target antigens simultaneously. This avidity effect is often viewed as beneficial because it increases apparent binding strength and can improve target engagement. However, therapeutic success is not always driven by target occupancy alone. For mechanisms that rely on Fc-mediated effector function, the number of antibodies decorating the target cell surface may be just as important. The study highlights: Bivalent antibodies achieved higher antigen occupancy than comparable monovalent antibodies across a range of affinities and antigen densities. At the same time, bivalency reduced the total number of antibodies bound per cell because a single antibody could occupy two antigens simultaneously. The authors describe an "avidity barrier," where achieving equivalent levels of cell surface opsonization requires substantially higher concentrations of a bivalent antibody. The optimal balance between occupancy and opsonization depended on factors including antibody affinity, valency, and target antigen density.

A causal link between autoantibodies and neurological symptoms in long COVID

May 28, 2026
Abstract: Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers the de novo production of diverse, functional autoantibodies (AABs) that remain elevated in Long COVID (LC), but their pathogenic role remains unclear. Using tissue-based immunofluorescence, ELISA, human protein array, and mass spectrometry assays, we identified a broad range of AAB targets among individuals with LC. Individuals with neurocognitive symptoms showed increased AABs against central and peripheral nervous system proteins. Purified IgG reacted with human locus coeruleus, thalamus, adrenal gland, thyroid, and cross-reacted with mouse sciatic nerve and meninges. CNS-reactive AABs correlated with several neurological symptoms. MED20-targeting IgG from patients with LC showed enhanced antibody-dependent phagocytosis. Passive transfer of IgG from individuals with LC into mice induced fatigue-like behavior, loss of balance/coordination, thermal hyperalgesia, small fiber nerve damage, and increased pain-related neuronal activity, recapitulating patients’ symptoms. These findings suggest that targeting AABs might offer therapeutic benefits for this LC subgroup. 

World Vaccine Congress 2026

May 18, 2026
Type: Conference Dates: October 19th-21st, 2026 Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands

Vaccines Summit 2026

May 18, 2026
Type: Conference Dates: November 16th-18th, 2026 Location: Peabody, MA

Navigating the clinical progress of antibody-drug conjugates: Emerging opportunities and remaining challenges

May 18, 2026
The Fc Review: How much does Fc design influence the next generation of ADCs? A recent Cell review explores the rapid evolution of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), highlighting how advances in payloads, linker technologies, and antibody engineering are reshaping the field across both hematologic and solid tumors. Background: ADCs were originally developed as targeted delivery vehicles for highly potent payloads. But as the field matures, it is becoming increasingly clear that ADC activity is shaped by far more than antigen targeting alone. Factors such as linker stability, payload permeability, tumor microenvironment, bystander killing, and Fc-mediated interactions can all influence therapeutic performance. The study highlights: Fc-mediated mechanisms such as ADCC, ADCP, and complement activation can contribute to ADC activity beyond payload delivery. Some next-generation ADCs are intentionally engineered to enhance Fc effector function, while others incorporate Fc-silencing strategies to minimize off-tumor interactions. Payload selection, linker chemistry, and drug-to-antibody ratio all influence efficacy, safety, and bystander activity. Tumor antigen expression alone is often insufficient to predict ADC behavior, highlighting the importance of functional characterization and biological context.

Glycan pairing in therapeutic IgG orchestrates Fcγ receptor engagement and ADCC: an integrated structure-function approach for thorough evaluation of Fc N-glycans as critical quality attributes

April 21, 2026
The Fc Review: Are we oversimplifying Fc glycosylation? A recent study in mAbs explores how glycan pairing within IgG antibodies shapes Fcγ receptor engagement and ADCC, highlighting an often-overlooked layer of Fc biology. Background: Fc glycosylation is a well-known modulator of antibody function, influencing Fcγ receptor binding and downstream effector activity. However, each IgG contains two Fc glycans, one on each heavy chain, that can pair symmetrically or asymmetrically. Most analytical approaches report glycan composition as an average, without capturing how these glycans are distributed across individual molecules. This study asks a key question. Does glycan pairing itself influence Fc function? The study highlights: Fc glycan pairing, not just overall composition, influences Fcγ receptor binding across multiple receptors and allotypes A single afucosylated glycan was sufficient to drive enhanced FcγRIIIa binding and ADCC, with limited additional benefit from full afucosylation Galactosylation and high-mannose structures showed receptor- and context-dependent effects on Fc engagement Functional outcomes cannot be fully inferred from bulk glycan profiles, as different pairing configurations can produce distinct biological behavior

Impacts of Antibody Structure and Mixtures on Receptor Signaling for Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity

March 10, 2026
The Fc Review: How do antibody structure and binding dynamics shape ADCC signaling? A recent study in The AAPS Journal explores how multiple antibody design features, including Fab affinity, hinge flexibility, Fc engagement, and antigen density, influence antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) signaling. Background: ADCC is a key mechanism of action for many therapeutic antibodies, yet the strength of this response depends on more than Fcγ receptor binding alone. Productive immune activation requires antibodies to bridge target cells and effector cells within the immune synapse, forming receptor crosslinks that trigger downstream signaling. Using a combination of computational modeling and experimental data, this study examines how structural properties of antibodies influence these crosslinking events and ultimately shape ADCC signaling outcomes. The study highlights: ADCC signaling is influenced by multiple antibody properties, including Fab affinity, hinge flexibility, Fc receptor engagement, and antigen expression levels. Antibody structure affects how efficiently Fc receptors and target antigens are crosslinked within the immune synapse. In some cases, moderate Fab affinity supported stronger signaling by favoring productive crosslinking configurations. Antibody valency and hinge flexibility also influenced signaling outcomes by altering the geometry of immune synapse interactions.

Cross-species cellular mapping and humanization of Fcγ receptors to advance antibody modeling

February 12, 2026
The Fc Review: How well do our preclinical models capture human Fc biology? A new Science Immunology study takes a deep look at Fcγ receptor and FcRn expression across humans, non-human primates, and mice, highlighting how species-specific differences shape Fc-mediated immune function. Background: Fc-dependent activity is influenced not only by antibody design, but also by where and how Fcγ receptors are expressed across immune cell types and tissues. While animal models remain central to #antibody development, differences in Fcγ receptor biology across species can complicate interpretation of Fc-driven mechanisms. The study highlights: Species-specific differences in Fcγ receptor expression patterns across immune cell subsets and tissues. Context-dependent regulation of Fcγ receptors by inflammatory cues, with expression shifting across cell types and environments. These differences influence how Fc-mediated functions are engaged and interpreted across experimental systems. Cross-species variation in FcγR and FcRn biology helps explain why Fc-dependent effects observed preclinically may not always translate cleanly to human settings. 

Fc engineering by monoclonal mammalian cell display for improved affinity and selectivity towards FcγRs

January 21, 2026
The Fc Review: How are antibody developers actually using Fc engineering today? A recent analysis of the IMGT/mAb-DB database takes a systematic look at engineered Fc variants across therapeutic antibodies and fusion proteins, offering a real-world snapshot of how Fc design choices are being deployed in the clinic. Background: Fc engineering is often discussed in terms of individual mutations or isolated use cases. But at an industry level, it’s less clear how frequently Fc variants are used, which functions are prioritized, and whether antibodies rely on single or multiple Fc modifications. By mining curated entries in IMGT/mAb-DB, this study steps back to examine Fc engineering trends across approved and clinical-stage molecules. The review highlights: Fc engineering is widespread across therapeutic antibodies and fusion proteins cataloged in IMGT/mAb-DB Effector silencing strategies are commonly employed, particularly in programs prioritizing safety and controlled immune engagement Many molecules incorporate multiple Fc variants, rather than a single engineered change Fc modifications are used across a range of mechanisms and formats, underscoring Fc’s role as an intentional design lever
More Posts →