Evaluation of a mosaic HIV 1 vaccine in a multicentre randomised double blind placebo controlled phase 1 2a clinical trial APPROACH and in rhesus monkeys.

July 21, 2018

Background

More than 18 million new cases of HIV-1 infection were diagnosed worldwide in 2016. No licensed prophylactic HIV-1 vaccine exists. A major limitation to date has been the lack of direct comparability between clinical trials and preclinical studies. We aimed to evaluate mosaic adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26)-based HIV-1 vaccine candidates in parallel studies in humans and rhesus monkeys to define the optimal vaccine regimen to advance into clinical efficacy trials.

Methods

We conducted a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2a trial (APPROACH). Participants were recruited from 12 clinics in east Africa, South Africa, Thailand, and the USA. We included healthy, HIV-1-uninfected participants (aged 18–50 years) who were considered at low risk for HIV-1 infection. We randomly assigned participants to one of eight study groups, stratified by region. Participants and investigators were blinded to the treatment allocation throughout the study. We primed participants at weeks 0 and 12 with Ad26.Mos.HIV (5 × 1010 viral particles per 0·5 mL) expressing mosaic HIV-1 envelope (Env)/Gag/Pol antigens and gave boosters at weeks 24 and 48 with Ad26.Mos.HIV or modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA; 108 plaque-forming units per 0·5 mL) vectors with or without high-dose (250 μg) or low-dose (50 μg) aluminium adjuvanted clade C Env gp140 protein. Those in the control group received 0·9% saline. All study interventions were administered intramuscularly. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability of the vaccine regimens and Env-specific binding antibody responses at week 28. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed at week 52. All participants who received at least one vaccine dose or placebo were included in the safety analysis; immunogenicity was analysed using the per-protocol population. We also did a parallel study in rhesus monkeys (NHP 13-19) to assess the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of these vaccine regimens against a series of six repetitive, heterologous, intrarectal challenges with a rhesus peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived challenge stock of simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV-SF162P3). The APPROACH trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02315703.

Findings

Between Feb 24, 2015, and Oct 16, 2015, we randomly assigned 393 participants to receive at least one dose of study vaccine or placebo in the APPROACH trial. All vaccine regimens demonstrated favourable safety and tolerability. The most commonly reported solicited local adverse event was mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site (varying from 69% to 88% between the different active groups vs 49% in the placebo group). Five (1%) of 393 participants reported at least one grade 3 adverse event considered related to the vaccines: abdominal pain and diarrhoea (in the same participant), increased aspartate aminotransferase, postural dizziness, back pain, and malaise. The mosaic Ad26/Ad26 plus high-dose gp140 boost vaccine was the most immunogenic in humans; it elicited Env-specific binding antibody responses (100%) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis responses (80%) at week 52, and T-cell responses at week 50 (83%). We also randomly assigned 72 rhesus monkeys to receive one of five different vaccine regimens or placebo in the NHP 13-19 study. Ad26/Ad26 plus gp140 boost induced similar magnitude, durability, and phenotype of immune responses in rhesus monkeys as compared with humans and afforded 67% protection against acquisition of SHIV-SF162P3 infection (two-sided Fisher's exact test p=0·007). Env-specific ELISA and enzyme-linked immunospot assay responses were the principal immune correlates of protection against SHIV challenge in monkeys.

Interpretation

The mosaic Ad26/Ad26 plus gp140 HIV-1 vaccine induced comparable and robust immune responses in humans and rhesus monkeys, and it provided significant protection against repetitive heterologous SHIV challenges in rhesus monkeys. This vaccine concept is currently being evaluated in a phase 2b clinical efficacy study in sub-Saharan Africa (NCT03060629).

Funding

Janssen Vaccines & Prevention BV, National Institutes of Health, Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, US Department of Defense, and International AIDS Vaccine Initiative.

Authors:

Barouch DH, et al. Lancet. 2018 Jul 21; 392(10143): 232–243.

Journal:

Lancet

Access Full Publication

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Fc-optimized GITR antibody enhances a CD4 T cell–dendritic cell crosstalk to promote antitumor immunity

August 13, 2026

The Fc Review: When you engineer the Fc to enhance one mechanism, what else changes? A recent Nature Cancer study takes a closer look at that question using an agonistic anti-GITR antibody, showing how Fc optimization can influence not only FcγR engagement and Treg depletion, but other immune pathways contributing to antitumor activity. Background: GITR is a stimulatory immune checkpoint receptor being explored as a target for cancer immunotherapy. While agonistic anti-GITR antibodies have shown promise preclinically, clinical efficacy has been limited. Because FcγR engagement can contribute to the activity of these antibodies, the authors used Fc protein engineering and glycoengineering to alter interactions with different human FcγRs and examine how those changes affected antitumor activity. The study highlights: Fc variants with enhanced engagement of activating FcγRIIa or FcγRIIIa increased antitumor activity, while preferentially enhancing engagement of inhibitory FcγRIIb did not improve tumor control. Combining G236A with reduced fucosylation enhanced engagement of both activating FcγRIIa and FcγRIIIa, without enhanced binding to FcγRIIb. This combined variant showed greater antitumor activity than variants enhancing either activating receptor individually in the tested model. Fc-active variants depleted Tregs within the tumor. However, the optimized variant and IgG1 produced similar Treg depletion despite differences in therapeutic activity, pointing to an additional FcγR-mediated mechanism. The Fc-optimized antibody also increased dendritic cell activation, and the authors found that conventional DCs, particularly cDC1s, were required for the Fc-mediated antitumor effect in their models. Further experiments connected this activity to CD4 T cell–DC engagement, with downstream CD4 T cell cytotoxicity and enhanced CD8 T cell activity

C1q and immunoglobulins mediate activity-dependent synapse loss in the adult brain

July 30, 2026

The Fc Review: Stepping a little outside therapeutic antibody and vaccine development this week to highlight a fascinating piece of fundamental antibody biology. A recent Science study uncovers an unexpected role for antibody-mediated complement activity in the adult mouse brain, showing that locally produced IgM and C1q work together to drive activity-dependent synapse elimination. While this work is still early and was performed in mice, it offers an interesting look at how #antibody effector mechanisms may extend beyond the roles we typically think about. Background: Antibodies are typically viewed through the lens of infection, vaccination, or therapeutic development. Their effector functions, including complement activation, are well established as key mechanisms for eliminating pathogens and diseased cells. This study asks whether antibody-mediated complement activity also contributes to normal brain physiology. Using mouse models, the authors investigated how neuronal activity influences complement-mediated synapse remodeling and whether adaptive immune components participate in this process. The study highlights: Increased neuronal activity triggered localized C1q deposition and complement-dependent synapse loss in the adult mouse hippocampus. Activity-dependent recruitment of antibody-secreting B-lineage cells led to local production of antigen-specific IgM, which contributed to C1q deposition at synapses. Reducing neuronal hyperactivity in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease decreased C1q deposition and partially restored synaptic density. The findings identify a previously unrecognized interaction between adaptive immunity, complement biology, and neuronal circuit remodeling in the adult brain.

Overview of antibody-drug conjugates nonclinical and clinical toxicities and related contributing factors

June 26, 2026

The Fc Review: Can better antibody engineering improve safety, not just efficacy? A recent review in Antibody Therapeutics examines how the molecular design of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) influences both nonclinical and clinical toxicities, highlighting that safety is determined by far more than the payload alone. Background: ADCs are often discussed in terms of target selection and payload potency, but their safety profile is shaped by the combined properties of the antibody, linker, payload, conjugation strategy, and target biology. This review examines data from marketed ADCs and explores how each component contributes to toxicity, providing a useful framework for designing safer next-generation therapeutics. The study highlights: ADC toxicity is influenced by the combined effects of target antigen expression, antibody structure, linker stability, payload properties, and conjugation technology rather than any single design feature. The Fc region can contribute to off-target toxicity through receptor-mediated uptake. The review discusses roles for Fcγ receptors, FcRn, and C-type lectin receptors in nonspecific internalization that may influence safety. Site-specific conjugation technologies can improve homogeneity, produce more consistent drug-to-antibody ratios (DAR), and enhance stability compared with earlier random conjugation approaches. Properties such as linker stability, payload hydrophobicity, charge, and DAR all influence biodistribution, payload release, and toxicity, underscoring the importance of considering these design variables together.

The double-edged nature of antibody bivalency: mathematical and experimental analysis of cell surface antigen occupancy and opsonization

June 4, 2026

The Fc Review: When does antibody bivalency help, and when can it work against you? A recent mAbs study explores the impact of antibody bivalency on antigen occupancy and cell surface opsonization, revealing that the same property can be advantageous or disadvantageous depending on the intended mechanism of action (MoA). Background: Most therapeutic antibodies are bivalent, meaning they can bind two target antigens simultaneously. This avidity effect is often viewed as beneficial because it increases apparent binding strength and can improve target engagement. However, therapeutic success is not always driven by target occupancy alone. For mechanisms that rely on Fc-mediated effector function, the number of antibodies decorating the target cell surface may be just as important. The study highlights: Bivalent antibodies achieved higher antigen occupancy than comparable monovalent antibodies across a range of affinities and antigen densities. At the same time, bivalency reduced the total number of antibodies bound per cell because a single antibody could occupy two antigens simultaneously. The authors describe an "avidity barrier," where achieving equivalent levels of cell surface opsonization requires substantially higher concentrations of a bivalent antibody. The optimal balance between occupancy and opsonization depended on factors including antibody affinity, valency, and target antigen density.

RRPV Meeting

June 1, 2026

Type: Meeting Dates: August 26th -27th, 2026 Location: Arlington, VA

11th International Filovirus Symposium

May 29, 2026

Type: Symposium Dates: September 13th-16th, 2026 Location: Atlanta, GA

A causal link between autoantibodies and neurological symptoms in long COVID

May 28, 2026

Abstract: Acute SARS-CoV-2 infection triggers the de novo production of diverse, functional autoantibodies (AABs) that remain elevated in Long COVID (LC), but their pathogenic role remains unclear. Using tissue-based immunofluorescence, ELISA, human protein array, and mass spectrometry assays, we identified a broad range of AAB targets among individuals with LC. Individuals with neurocognitive symptoms showed increased AABs against central and peripheral nervous system proteins. Purified IgG reacted with human locus coeruleus, thalamus, adrenal gland, thyroid, and cross-reacted with mouse sciatic nerve and meninges. CNS-reactive AABs correlated with several neurological symptoms. MED20-targeting IgG from patients with LC showed enhanced antibody-dependent phagocytosis. Passive transfer of IgG from individuals with LC into mice induced fatigue-like behavior, loss of balance/coordination, thermal hyperalgesia, small fiber nerve damage, and increased pain-related neuronal activity, recapitulating patients’ symptoms. These findings suggest that targeting AABs might offer therapeutic benefits for this LC subgroup.